>> 《Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response》简述
Part 2 Data collection and products
Real-time data collection and information generation using airborne sensors
N. Kerle
Department of Earth Systems Analysis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science
and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands
S. Heuel
Ernst Basler+Partner AG, Zollikon, Switzerland
N. Pfeifer
Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
ABSTRACT: In this chapter we review existing airborne platforms and sensors, as well as the
products that can be generated from the data they acquire, and assess their utility in the context
of emergency response. Airborne remote sensing has a much longer history then satellite-based
Earth observation, which has led to the development of a wide variety of vehicles that can carry
different sensors, ranging from tethered balloons to UnmannedAerialVehicles (UAVs) that operate
at stratospheric heights. We base our evaluation on a number of objective assessment criteria
that include technical and commercial aspects, as well as various considerations for emergency
response, such as required processing time or use for a given disaster type. We specifically show
how different emergencies can lead to a range of observable consequences that call for suitably
adapted remote sensing tools, and how more sophisticated products, e.g. 3D or 4D, or integrated
in a GIS environment, can lead to improved response capability. We review the use of optical,
thermal, laser scanning and radar data, and show how they are best suited for different disaster
scenarios. Thus the decision on which data type or product to use in a given emergency situation
is a multi-criteria problem that requires good understanding of the available information types,
their utility for the disaster in question, but also practical and flexible thinking to identify potential
alternatives. We show that airborne remote sensing has great potential to aid in an emergency
situation, though also note that the provision of value-added products within the 3 day response window we consider here will not always be possible. We conclude with a table that summarises
the relevant characteristics of the main remote sensing data types and products with respect to their
suitability for different disaster types, which can serve as guidance for decision makers.